Course:
|
PHIL 103 Introduction
to Philosophy: Classics of Western Philosophy |
|||||
Professor:
|
Garry Hagberg |
|||||
CRN: |
15622 |
Schedule/Location: |
Tue Fri 1:30 PM
– 2:50 PM Olin 201 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap: 22 |
||||
A critical examination of the work of some major figures in
the history of philosophy, emphasizing historical continuities and developments
in the subject. Authors include Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Locke, Berkeley,
Hume, Nietzsche, and Russell.
Course:
|
PHIL 124 Introduction
to Ethics |
|||||
Professor:
|
James Brudvig |
|||||
CRN: |
15623 |
Schedule/Location: |
Tue Thurs 3:30 PM
– 4:50 PM Olin 203 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap: 21 |
||||
Crosslists: Human Rights |
||||||
This course aims to accomplish three main goals. First, it
will provide an analytical and historical introduction to ethical theories.
Second, it will build a vocabulary for understanding and discussing ethical
topics and issues. And third, it will apply ethical theories and language in an
attempt to clarify contemporary moral problems.
Course:
|
PHIL 129 Philosophy
of Slavery |
|||||
Professor:
|
Jay Elliott |
|||||
CRN: |
15624 |
Schedule/Location: |
Mon Wed 8:30 AM
– 9:50 AM Olin 201 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value D+J Difference and Justice |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap: 22 |
||||
Crosslists: Classical Studies; Human Rights |
||||||
How can one human being own another? Today many of us regard
slavery as the ultimate example of an unthinkable evil. Yet we also live in a
society powerfully shaped by the institution and aftereffects of slavery, and
recent events have shed renewed light on the enduring legacy of slavery in the
United States. Our focus will be on two major slave societies to which we stand
in an uncomfortably intimate relation: Greco-Roman antiquity and the modern
Atlantic. We will seek to understand slavery and its enduring effects through
these two slave societies and the interrelations between them. A special focus
of our course will be the historically deep but under-examined connection
between philosophy and slavery. Many of the founding figures of Western
political thought – including Aristotle and Hegel – produced justifications of
slavery that are often ignored today but that raise profound questions about
the intellectual legacies of these canonical thinkers. Alongside these
philosophers, we will also approach the inner life of slave societies through a
variety of other sources, including drama, memoir and legal codes. Throughout
the course we will consider a range of questions, including: how has slavery
been intellectually justified and maintained in slave societies? How does the
practice of slavery intersect with ideas about nature, work, property, sex,
race, nationality and belonging? How do thinkers within slave societies come to
develop critiques of slavery? What does it mean for slavery to end? The course
will conclude with an examination of the incomplete work of liberation and the
continuing effects of slavery in the contemporary U.S.
Course:
|
PHIL 131 Art,
Narrative, and Humane Understanding |
|||||
Professor:
|
Zachary Weinstein |
|||||
CRN: |
15677 |
Schedule/Location: |
Tue Thurs 5:10 PM
– 6:30 PM Olin 202 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap: 22 |
||||
How do we understand
other people as people, rather than as biological or physical systems?
How should we understand other people? In this course, we’ll explore
these questions as they arise in epistemology, philosophy of mind, and
aesthetics. First, we will look at theories of understanding, especially
the relationship between understanding and knowledge and the value of
understanding. We’ll look at the ancient roots of these issues in Plato and
Aristotle, as well as contemporary treatments by authors like Catherine Elgin
and Duncan Pritchard. Then, we will turn to the question of
understanding other people. We’ll focus on two closely related issues:
mindreading (how do we learn about what goes on in someone else’s mind?) and
empathy (how can we take on someone else’s perspective?). We’ll read
authors from the ‘hermeneutical’ tradition (Dilthey, Gadamer) as well as contemporary analytic philosophers
(Jane Heal, Alvin Goldman). In the last part of the course, we will look at a
cluster of questions about understanding artworks, narratives, and
people. In particular, we’ll consider how understanding an artwork is like
(and unlike) understanding a person. Here, we’ll read thinkers from different
traditions and disciplines, including David Velleman,
Martha Nussbaum, Paul Ricoeur, Erwin Panofsky, and
Sigmund Freud. Throughout the course, we will be interested in the ethical
implications of different views of humane understanding. This course is
appropriate for students at all levels. Students who do have some background in
philosophy and/or the arts will have the opportunity to pursue existing
interests in more depth.
Course:
|
PHIL 215 Existentialism |
|||||
Professor:
|
Daniel Berthold |
|||||
CRN: |
15625 |
Schedule/Location: |
Tue Thurs 10:10 AM
– 11:30 AM Hegeman 201 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap: 22 |
||||
Existentialism is a philosophic, literary, artistic, and
social movement emerging during the second World War in France, but with roots
tracing back to the Danish Christian philosopher Søren Kierkegaard and the
German atheist philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche in the nineteen century. We will
engage in a close study of selected writings of Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Sartre,
Camus, and Heidegger. We will focus both on themes which have come to be
regarded as common existentialist preoccupations such as the rebellion against
rationalism; the corresponding emphasis on subjectivity and perspectivism; the
perception of the human predicament as absurd; the revaluation of values; and
the necessity of anxiety and suffering for authentic existence; as well as
emphasizing important differences of perspective and style between these five
writers.
Course:
|
PHIL 219 Body and
World: Selves and Social Sense-Making |
|||||
Professor:
|
James Keller |
|||||
CRN: |
15626 |
Schedule/Location: |
Mon Wed 1:30 PM
– 2:50 PM Hegeman 204 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap: 22 |
||||
Our everyday accounts of perception, action, social norms,
language, and even intelligence take conceptual rationality as the essential
feature of human life. A good deal of recent philosophy, though, explores the
possibility that we might not be “rational all the way out” and that we use
concepts to supplement other, embodied ways of knowing, being, and being with
others. The first part of this course examines conceptual and non-conceptual
ways that we make sense of reality. We then look at ways that bodies conform to
or reconfigure social ideals of normalcy. The readings that we encounter argue
for a more inclusive form of realism in our accounts of perception, action,
language and intelligence, and we consider a plurality of diverse embodiments
and a range of understandings of the ways that bodied selves and social life are
woven together.
Course:
|
PHIL 237 Symbolic
Logic |
|||||
Professor:
|
Robert Tully |
|||||
CRN: |
15627 |
Schedule/Location: |
Mon Wed 10:10 AM
– 11:30 AM Hegeman 308 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MC Mathematics and Computing |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap: 20 |
||||
Crosslists: Mind, Brain, Behavior |
||||||
Logic is not imposed on natural language but embedded in it.
Symbolic Logic maps its logical structure. The course starts with whole
statements (the units of language with which truth and falsity are associated)
and the different ways they combine into compound statements. It then proceeds
to examine arguments, which connect statements by means of a fundamental
relation called implication. (The course concentrates on deductive implication,
the strongest form of this relation.) The analysis of arguments extends to the
internal components of whole statements: names, properties and relations.
Different strategies are introduced throughout for testing symbolized arguments
as well as for constructing them. Nevertheless, the course does not bury itself
in abstraction. Whenever appropriate, it will emphasize the presence of logic
within the domain of natural language use. For any student, the concepts and methods
encountered in this course enable a precise understanding of words such as
proof, inference, validity, equivalence, truth, entailment, and necessity, thus
providing objective standards for appraising the diverse meanings frequently
given to such words in everyday language.
Course:
|
PHIL 238 Philosophy
and Literature |
|||||
Professor:
|
Ruth Zisman |
|||||
CRN: |
15628 |
Schedule/Location: |
Tue Thurs 11:50 AM
– 1:10 PM Olin 304 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value |
|||||
Credits: 4 Crosslists: German Studies |
|
Class cap: 18 |
||||
In reflecting upon his book, The Birth of Tragedy, Nietzsche
famously writes that he “should have sung, not spoken” the text; “what a
shame,” he laments, “that I did not dare to utter as a poet what I had to say
at that time.” Reverence for the literary is, of course, not uncommon in the
philosophical tradition. From Aristotle’s praise of metaphor making as the mark
of genius to Heidegger’s conception of the saving power of poiesis,
philosophers have been known to extol the virtues of literature. Yet one must
not forget that the relationship between philosophy and literature is also
fraught. Socrates exiled the poets from his city in speech – reminding his
disciples, “there is an ancient quarrel between philosophy and poetry...an
ancient antagonism” – thus leading us to ponder the various ways in which
literature might threaten or challenge the work of philosophy. In this course,
we will explore the relationship between philosophy and literature by reading
philosophical and literary texts side by side. We will consider philosophical
theories of literature, philosophical references to literary texts and figures,
and literary portrayals of and allusions to philosophical questions and
problems.
Course:
|
PHIL 258 Constructing
Modern Science: Objectivity, Authority, Ideology |
|||||
Professor:
|
Michelle Hoffman |
|||||
CRN: |
15629 |
Schedule/Location: |
Tue Fri 1:30 PM
– 2:50 PM Olin 101 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap: 18 |
||||
Crosslists: Science, Technology, Society |
||||||
In debates over evolution, climate science, and the COVID
pandemic, the authority of science is continually asserted and challenged. This
course will examine how scientists, philosophers, and others have constructed
competing visions of science to further specific ends. At stake in all these
competing visions is the concept of scientific objectivity. What does it mean
for science to be objective? When and how did conceptions of objectivity gain
currency, and how are they connected to science’s authority in society? What is
the proper place for human values—social, political, ethical—in scientific
knowledge-making? We will draw on sources ranging from social histories of
seventeenth-century science to contemporary debates in the philosophy of
science, and we will consider case studies in science, technology, and public
health to grapple with the dilemmas that arise. This course satisfies the
Philosophy program’s Histories of Philosophy requirement. All majors are
required to take two courses fulfilling this requirement, starting with the
class of 2025.
Course:
|
PHIL 302 Philosophy
Research Seminar |
|||||
Professor:
|
Kathryn Tabb |
|||||
CRN: |
15630 |
Schedule/Location: |
Thurs 3:10 PM
– 5:30 PM Olin 305 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap: 18 |
||||
An intensive advanced seminar required of all philosophy
majors in their junior year. A problem in contemporary philosophy is carefully
selected, exactingly defined, and thoroughly researched; an essay or article is
written addressing the problem, going through numerous revisions as a result of
class responses, faculty guidance, and further research; the article is
formally presented to the seminar, followed by discussion and debate; and the
article in its completed form is submitted to an undergraduate or professional
journal of philosophy or to an undergraduate conference in philosophy. The
seminar integrates the teaching and practice of writing into the study of the
subject matter of the seminar. Emphasis will be placed on the art of research;
the development, composition, organization, and revision of analytical prose;
the use of evidence to support an argument; strategies of interpretation and
analysis of texts; and the mechanics and art of style and documentation. This
course is required of all junior Philosophy majors.
Course:
|
PHIL 306 The
Philosophy Lab |
|||||
Professor:
|
Kathryn Tabb |
|||||
CRN: |
15631 |
Schedule/Location: |
Fri 3:30 PM
–4:50 PM Olin 302 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value |
|||||
Credits: 2 |
|
Class cap: 12 |
||||
This two-credit course will focus on philosophy as a
discipline, with special attention to questions of inclusion and access.
Students will meet biweekly to discuss readings on the current state of the
profession and its history, to learn about what life as a philosopher looks
like at the post-graduate and professional levels, and to contribute to the
community of the program. This last component might include choosing speakers
for the annual Speaker Series, organizing events for the Philosophy Salon,
managing the Philosophy Study Room, and participating in a mentoring program.
Written work will include response papers as well as other short assignments.
This class is open to all moderated students in Philosophy or by permission of
the instructor.
Course:
|
PHIL 360 Feminist
Philosophy |
|||||
Professor:
|
Daniel Berthold |
|||||
CRN: |
15632 |
Schedule/Location: |
Tue 3:10 PM
– 5:30 PM Olin 309 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value D+J Difference and Justice |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap: 16 |
||||
Crosslists: Gender and Sexuality Studies; Human Rights |
||||||
The course will examine a variety of feminist philosophical approaches
to issues surrounding modern culture’s production of images of sexuality and
gender. Some background readings will
provide a sketch of a diverse range of feminist theoretical frameworks –
liberal, socialist, radical, psychoanalytic, and postmodern – with readings
from Alison Jaggar, Simone de Beauvoir, Annie Leclerc, Christine Delphy, Julia
Kristeva, Luce Irigaray, Sarah Kofman, and Hélène Cixous. We will then turn to an exploration of such
issues as the cultural enforcement of both feminine and masculine gender
identities, the mass-marketing of popular cultural images of sexuality, gender,
and race, the urban environment and women’s sense of space, the intersection of
feminism and environmentalism, the logic of subjection governing cultural ideals
of women’s bodies (dieting, exercise, clothing, bodily comportment), issues of
rape, sexual violence and harassment, pornography, and feminist perspectives of
different ethnic groups. We will also
screen a number of films and videos, including the Anita Hill/Clarence Thomas
hearings, Madonna’s “Truth or Dare,” and documentaries on the pre-Stonewall
femme-butch bar-scene culture of the 1950s and 60s, anorexia, rape on campus,
the pornographic film industry, and several others.
Course:
|
PHIL 363 Ethics with
Aristotle |
|||||
Professor:
|
Jay Elliott |
|||||
CRN: |
15633 |
Schedule/Location: |
Mon Wed 11:50 AM
– 1:10 PM Olin 306 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap: 15 |
||||
During the twentieth century and into the twenty-first,
philosophers have been increasingly drawn to the work of a revolutionary
thinker whose ideas have come to dominate much of contemporary Anglophone
ethics. Who is this thinker? Aristotle. Yes, that Aristotle, a guy who died
over two thousand years ago and whose ideas are available to us only in the
form of notoriously obscure jottings in ancient manuscripts. In this course, we
will study in depth Aristotle’s most influential ethical work, Nicomachean Ethics,
while also encountering a range of thinkers who represent his contemporary
influence. Some questions we will consider are: What is distinctive about
Aristotle’s approach to ethics? What contribution might its central concepts,
such as virtue, happiness, pleasure, friendship, and luck, make to our
thinking? How can we adapt Aristotle’s ideas to our very different social and
political context? Can we engage productively with Aristotle despite the
infamously problematic aspects of his work, such as his endorsement of
aristocracy, slavery and patriarchy? Might Aristotle even be valuable for
contemporary feminist or socialist critique? How might an encounter with this
strange and difficult philosopher help us to overcome the categories and
assumptions that constrain our thinking? We will also experiment with doing
ethics for ourselves using Aristotelian concepts and methods. This course
fulfills the Junior Seminar requirement for Philosophy majors. Students
majoring in Philosophy are required to take at least one Junior Seminar after
moderation and before graduating.
Course:
|
PHIL 385 Philosophy
of Wittgenstein |
|||||
Professor:
|
Garry Hagberg |
|||||
CRN: |
15634 |
Schedule/Location: |
Mon 3:10 PM
– 5:30 PM Olin 305 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap: 15 |
||||
A first reading of major works of one of the most influential
philosophers of the twentieth-century, Ludwig Wittgenstein. Readings: Tractatus
Logico-Philosophicus, The Blue Book, and The Philosophical Investigations. This
course fulfills the single-philosopher requirement for junior philosophy
majors.
Cross-listed courses:
Course:
|
HR 235 Dignity and
the Human Rights Tradition |
|||||
Professor:
|
Roger Berkowitz |
|||||
CRN: |
15610 |
Schedule/Location: |
Mon Wed 11:50 AM
– 1:10 PM Olin 202 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap 22 |
||||
Crosslists: Philosophy; Political Studies |
||||||
Course:
|
HR 384 The Great
Divide: Human vs. Nature in the Question of Human Rights |
|||||
Professor:
|
Oscar Pedraza Vargas |
|||||
CRN: |
15673 |
Schedule/Location: |
Mon 3:10 PM
– 5:30 PM |
|||
Distributional Area: |
SA Social Analysis D+J Difference and Justice |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap 6 |
||||
Crosslists: Environmental & Urban Studies; Philosophy |
||||||
Course:
|
CC 108 B The Courage to be: The Face of the Other |
|||||
Professor:
|
Joshua Boettiger |
|||||
CRN: |
15984 |
Schedule/Location: |
Mon Thurs 1:30 PM
- 2:50 PM Olin 307 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
MBV Meaning, Being, Value LA
Literary Analysis in English |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap: 16 |
||||
Crosslists: Jewish Studies, Philosophy, Religion |
||||||
Course:
|
MES/PS 302 Muslim
Political Thought and Anticolonialism |
|||||
Professor:
|
Pinar Kemerli |
|||||
CRN: |
15681 |
Schedule/Location: |
Fri 12:30 PM
– 2:50 PM Olin 305 |
|||
Distributional Area: |
SA Social Analysis |
|||||
Credits: 4 |
|
Class cap 15 |
||||
Crosslists: Global & International Studies; Human Rights; Philosophy; Political
Studies; Study of Religions |
||||||