11106 |
PHIL 104 Introduction to Philosophy from a Multicultural Perspective |
Daniel Berthold |
. T . Th . |
8:30 - 9:50 am |
OLIN 201 |
HUM |
This course is an introduction to such major themes
in the history of philosophy as the nature of reality and our capacity to know
it; issues of ethics and justice; and conceptions of how one should live. Readings will include selections from a
diverse range of traditions, including Western, Hindu, Buddhist, Chinese,
African, Native American, and feminist texts.
Class size: 22
11422 |
PHIL 113 Introduction to the Philosophy of Education |
Ariana Stokas |
. T . Th . |
11:50 - 1:10 pm |
OLIN 205 |
HUM |
Cross listed: Cognitive Science The course seeks to introduce students to
philosophical thinking about education. Course work centers around the
close reading of primary texts in the history of ideas, with a focus on how
these texts illuminate the meanings and significance of educational practice.
We will draw from ontology, epistemology, aesthetics and ethics in our effort
to understand the nature and purposes of education. We will engage questions
such as: What is education? Is
education something that occurs only in a school environment? Why do we create
schools and does education, understood as an ontological entity, show us
something about the nature of human existence? What is "teaching"?
How does teaching differ from other social practices such as medicine, law,
social work, and nursing? How does teaching differ from parenting and
friendship? And what, or who, is a "teacher"? Should teachers be
certain kinds of persons, with certain kinds of moral and intellectual
sensibilities? What is worth knowing and studying? Posed differently, what is a
"curriculum"? What is a "course of study"? Is the latter a
body of facts to be memorized? A set of questions to be posed and contemplated?
A conversation about how we perceive and understand the world? What are the
grounds, rationales, and philosophies of life educators might appeal to in
their response to such questions? And why might it be important to address such
questions before teaching students, whether in schools, universities, or other
sites? Texts include: Plato, The
Republic, Aristotle, The Nichomachean
Ethics, Jean Jacques Rousseau, Emile,
Rabindranath Tagore, Personality, John
Dewey, Experience and Education,
Hannah Arendt, Between Past and Future:
Eight Exercises in Political Thought, and Paulo Freire, Pedagogy Of The Oppressed. Class size: 22
11221 |
PHIL 114 Introduction to Philosophy of Action |
Kritika Yegnashankaran |
M . W . . |
1:30 - 2:50 pm |
OLIN 308 |
HUM |
Placing a leaf on my head seems different in kind
from a leaf’s falling on my head. The first we might call an action, and the second something that
merely happens to me. Distinguishing our actions from what merely happens to us
has important consequences for our self-conception, the way others assess and
react to us, and our legal fate, to name a few. But what distinguishes actions
from mere happenings? And is that an exhaustive distinction, or are there
phenomena in the middle, such as driving on autopilot or drumming one’s
fingers? In this course, we will examine questions about what distinguishes
actions from happenings, and whether action comes in degree. We will focus on
four main kinds of philosophical views, those that emphasize: (1) causal
history; (2) the role of the agent; (3) explanation and knowledge of action;
(4) the qualitative aspects of action. Class size: 22
11159 |
PS 115 Introduction to Political Thinking |
Roger Berkowitz |
. . W . F |
10:10 - 11:30 am |
OLIN 301 |
SSCI |
(PS
core course) Cross-listed:
Philosophy From Plato to Hannah Arendt, great thinkers in the Western
tradition have asked about the nature and practice of political
action. Thinking about politics is, knowingly or not, conducted
against the background of this shared tradition. This is no less true
of political thought that aims to break away from “the classics” than
of political thought that finds in them a constant resource for
both critical and constructive thinking. This course explores
fundamental questions of politics through a core body of readings by
thinkers including Plato, More, Machiavelli, Rousseau, Marx, and
Arendt. Looking comparatively at texts from ancient to recent
times, we will compare more “utopian” with more cynical or “realist”
approaches to political thinking while reflecting upon key political
concepts such as justice, democracy, and “the individual”. We will also
explore such enduring questions as the relationship between the state and
the individual; the conditions for peaceful political order; and the connection
between morality and politics. Class
size: 22
11655 |
PHIL 120 Introduction to Philosophy of Science |
David Shein |
M . W . . |
3:10 - 4:30 pm |
OLIN 203 |
HUM |
Cross-listed: Science, Technology &
Society In
this course, we will attempt to come to an understanding of the nature and
limits of science and scientific reasoning.
Our approach will be thematic and will include the following: the
demarcation problem (what distinguishes scientific theories from putatively
non-scientific theories such as astrology and creationism?), the riddles of
induction (what reason is there to think the future will resemble the past?),
models of explanation (what makes an explanation scientific?), the
underdetermination thesis (can evidence ever confirm or disconfirm a theory?),
and the realism/anti-realism debate (does science tell us what the world is
really like?). Authors to be read
include: Carl Hempel, David Hume, Thomas Kuhn, Karl Popper, WV Quine, Alan
Sokal, Bas van Fraassen, and others.
Class size: 22
11112 |
PHIL 207 Medieval Philosophy |
Adam Rosen |
M . W . . |
1:30 - 2:50 pm |
OLIN 201 |
HUM |
Cross-listed:
Medieval Studies Are
faith and reason essentially antagonistic or might they require one another for
their mutual perfection? What, then, are the powers and limits of faith and
reason, both independently and in relation to one another? These questions were
central to the Jewish, Christian, and Islamic philosopher-theologians on whose
work we will concentrate: Moses Maimonides, St. Thomas Aquinas, Abū Nasr
al-Fārābi, and Avicenna (Abū ‘Alī al-Husayn ibn ‘Abd
Allāh ibn Sīnā' ). Of particular interest will be: specifying
the endemic failures of faith and reason and their consequent need of one
another (e.g., faith immunized from reason becomes blind pietism, just as
reason, insulated from faith, becomes irrational because it is unable to
specify its limits, and so the nature of its conclusions); tracing the lineages
of Plato and Aristotle in the Medieval tradition(s), especially with regard to
the former’s conception of matter and the latter’s distinction between patient
and agent intellect; and bringing into relief the peculiarity of the modern,
especially Kantian, determination of the relation of theoretical and practical
reason by establishing its contrast with Medieval determinations of the
relation of knowledge and practice, i.e., relations between rational and
ethical virtues. Additional topics will include: revelation and its bearing on
reason, morality, and the pursuit of human perfection; differential accounts of
harmonization with the divine (e.g., access to providence) and its conditions;
the human good and the nature of evil; and whether and how religious devotion
can survive genuine confrontation with the questions raised by multiple
religions. Class size: 22
11656 |
HR 235 Dignity and Human Rights Traditions |
Roger Berkowitz |
. . W . . . . . . F |
3:10 -4:30 pm 1:30 - 2:50 pm |
OLIN 205 OLIN 204 |
HUM/DIFF |
Cross-listed: Political Studies, Philosophy We live at a time when the claim to human rights is both taken for granted and regularly disregarded. One reason for the disconnect between the reality and the ideal of human rights is that human rights have never been given a secure philosophical foundation. Indeed, many have argued that absent a religiously grounded faith in human dignity, there is no legal ground for human rights. Might it be that human rights are simply well-meaning aspirations without legal or philosophical foundation? And what is dignity anyway? Ought we to abandon talk about dignity and admit that human rights are groundless? Against this view, human rights advocates, international lawyers, and constitutional judges continue to speak of dignity as the core value of the international legal system. Indeed, lawyers in Germany and South Africa are developing a "dignity jurisprudence" that might guarantee human rights on the foundation of human dignity. Is it possible, therefore, to develop a secular and legally meaningful idea of dignity that can offer a ground for human rights? This class explores both the modern challenge to dignity and human rights as well as attempts to resuscitate a new and more coherent secular ideal of dignity as a legally valid guarantee of human rights. In addition to texts including Hannah Arendt's book, The Origins of Totalitarianism, we read legal cases, and documents from international law. Class size: 22
11109 |
PHIL 237 Symbolic Logic |
William Griffith |
. T . Th . |
1:30 - 2:50 pm |
ASP 302 |
MATC |
Cross
listed: Cognitive Science For over two millennia the fact that some
deductive arguments are “valid” and the fact that we have an ability to recognize
that fact (at least some of us and sometimes!) has been a subject of interest
to philosophers, and later mathematicians.
In this course students will learn to use several different symbolic
systems, some developed many centuries apart, which have been created in order
to formally test for the validity of arguments expressed in ordinary language
of various levels of complexity.
Beginning from the common notion of a valid argument the course
progresses through: truth tables; a system of natural deduction for
propositional logic, which is proven to be consistent and complete;
Aristotelian logic - immediate inference, mediate inference, the square of
opposition; Venn diagrams; monadic quantificational theory; general
quantificational theory, including identity. At each level both the
characteristics of the formal systems and the task of interpreting their schemata into English are emphasized.
The course ends with a discussion of the extension of such work into higher
orders of logic and the foundations of mathematics and the surprise (at the
time) of Gödel’s incompleteness proof. No prerequisites. Open to students of any level. Class size: 16
11532 |
PHIL 251 Ethical Theory |
William Griffith |
M . W . . |
3:10 - 4:30 pm |
ASP 302 |
HUM |
Cross-listed:
Human Rights What is it
to be a “moral” being? What is it that one might call the “moral dimension” of
our lives? Filling out detailed
answers to such questions obviously would require such key concepts as “good,”
bad,” “evil,” ”happiness,” “the good life,” “virtue,” “wisdom,” “ought,”
“right,” “duty,” “justice,” “responsibility,” etc. An inquiry into the meaning or use of such concepts and the
epistemological status of statements which use them, (frequently called
“judgments of value”), are issues classified by contemporary philosophers as
“metaethical”, i.e., “about” ethics.
These are distinct from the task of making (and perhaps arguing for,
recommending that we live by) value judgments, e.g., “one ought never to rape,”
“all humans have these rights,” “we ought not to kill animals for food, “this,
in general, is how human beings ought to live,” etc., which is frequently
called doing “normative ethics.” It
might be described as philosophizing “within” ethics. Our readings and discussions will deal with both types of
questions as we focus on some of the primary texts of four philosophers whose
thoughts on these fundamental questions have had a major influence on western
philosophical thought: Aristotle, Epictetus, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill. We will also consider brief selections from
other philosophers: Thomas Reid,
Friedrich Nietzsche, William James, Jean-Paul Sartre, and A. J. Ayer. No Prerequisites. Open to students of any
level. Class size: 20
11113 |
PHIL 263 The Philosophy of Race |
Adam Rosen |
. . W . F |
10:10 - 11:30 am |
OLINLC 115 |
HUM/DIFF |
Cross-listed: Human Rights The major tasks of a philosophy of race
include: identifying and accounting for historically and geographically diverse
histories of racialization; clarifying the forms and normative significance of
the injuries of invidious racialization; acknowledging the motivations for and
evaluating the efficacy of critical reappropriations of racial identity; and
orienting resistance to ongoing forms of racialized injustice. Our question
will be, Is the normative purview of liberalism adequate to these tasks? In
order to address this question, the course will be divided into three parts.
The first part will be historical and diagnostic in character. We will
establish the centrality of race to the history of politics, morality, and
epistemology. Topics will include: the centrality of unfree and maligned
racialized others to the articulation of political values such as freedom and
individualism, moral values such as innocence and integrity, and social values
such as gender, sexual, and class norms; the role of racialization in the
history of colonialism and the birth of the modern state (i.e., biopolitics);
the question of a hidden anthropology in major stands of moral universalism;
and the epistemic implications of white privilege. The second part of the
course will be exploratory and critical. We will pose a number of questions
designed to disclose the limits of liberalism in regard to race. Topics will
include: the value of a psychoanalytic framework for understanding lived
experiences of and commitments to race; forms of recognitive injury (e.g.,
Orlando Patterson’s famous account of “soul murder”) and responses to it (e.g.,
Sartre’s notion of identificatory overcompensation) that fail to show up on
liberalism’s radar; and the politics of affirmative racialization in
anticolonial struggles. The third part of the course will be practically
oriented. We will explore the merits and weaknesses of three major forms of
resistance to racism: rights-based liberal universalism, class struggle, and
cultural politics (e.g., hip-hop). Class
size: 22
11533 |
PHIL 271 Topics in the Philosophy of Language |
Robert Martin |
. . W . F |
10:10 - 11:30 am |
OLIN 201 |
HUM |
Cross listed: Cognitive
Science We will
study Saul Kripke's ground-breaking lectures Naming and Necessity, given
at Princeton University in 1970. For background we will read essays of
Gottlob Frege, Bertrand Russell, John Searle and others. If time permits,
we will read some of the recent literature on Naming and Necessity.
Prerequisites: one prior course in philosophy (preferably Symbolic Logic)
and permission of the instructor. Class size: 22
11672 |
HR 328 Theories of Human Rights |
Olivia Custer |
. T . . . |
1:30 - 3:50 pm |
RKC 115 |
HUM |
11421 |
PHIL / CLAS 362 Plato's Writing: Dialog and Dialectic |
Thomas Bartscherer |
. T . . . |
3:10 - 5:30 pm |
OLIN 305 |
HUM |
Cross-listed:
Literature, Philosophy Interpreters
of Plato have often asked why he wrote in dialogue form, and the answers
proposed have frequently appealed to Plato’s conception of dialectic, although
the meaning of that term in his texts is itself a matter of considerable
debate. In this course, we shall be examining Plato’s writings from both a
philosophical and a literary perspective. Our main business will be close and
careful reading of whole dialogues, paying particular attention to the
hermeneutical implications of the dialogue form—including such features as
dramatic setting, character, and the interrogative mode itself—and the
conception of dialectic as it emerges both in and through Plato’s writing.
Readings from Plato will include Euthyphro, Euthydemus, Meno,
Phaedrus, Republic, and Sophist. Primary readings will be
complemented by a sampling of secondary scholarship that illustrates the wide
range of modern approaches to Plato. All readings will be in English.
Class
size: 15
11107 |
PHIL 368 The New Genetics: Ethical, Legal and Social
Issues |
Daniel Berthold |
. T . . . |
1:30 - 3:50 pm |
RKC 200 |
HUM |
Cross-listed: Human
Rights, Science, Technology & Society An examination of a variety of ethical, legal,
social, and scientific debates surrounding recent advances in genetics,
especially technologies facilitated by the decoding of the human genome:
genetic screening and testing, issues of justice (genetic discrimination and
privacy issues), gene therapy, cloning, and transgenic agriculture (genetically
modified crops). Prerequisites: previous courses in Philosophy and/or
Biology. Class size: 15
11108 |
PHIL 371 The Philosophy of Kant |
Olivia Custer |
M . . . . |
10:10 - 12:30 pm |
ASP 302 |
HUM |
Cross-listed: German Studies An introduction to one of the classic texts of western philosophy, Kant’s magnum opus, The Critique of Pure Reason. Prerequisite: a previous course in philosophy and permission of the instructor. Class size: 15
11222 |
PHIL 372 Philosophy of Biology: Conceptual Foundations of Darwinian Theory |
Kritika Yegnashankaran |
. T . . . |
4:40 - 7:00 pm |
OLIN 107 |
HUM |
The lively, and at times acrimonious, debate between
evolutionism and creationism continues, but we can get clearer on the terms of
the debate only by understanding precisely what each position is committed to.
In this course we will undertake an in-depth examination of the conceptual
foundations of Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection. We will
address issues such as: the ingredients for natural selection; the units and
levels of selection; the role of teleological notions, especially that of
adaptation; the distinction between explanations of origin and distribution;
the individuation of biological categories and kinds; the domain of phenomena
which the theory purports to explain and to which the theory can be applied;
and the conditions under which the theory can be corroborated or falsified.
Prerequisite: One course in either Philosophy or Biology. Class
size: 15