Courses listed as
CLASSICS (CLAS) are entirely in English and require no knowledge of an ancient
language. Greek, Latin and
Sanskrit all involve the study of the language itself.
CRN |
93020 |
Distribution |
C |
Course
No. |
HIST / CLAS 157 |
||
Title |
The
Athenian Century |
||
Professor |
Carolyn Dewald |
||
Schedule |
Mon Wed 3:00 pm -4:20 pm OLIN 306 |
The
Corinthians in Thucydides say of the Athenians: "In a word, they are by
nature incapable of living a quiet life themselves or of allowing anyone else
to do so either." Fifth-century
Athens is our first western example of a culture that becomes non-traditional;
one's role was no longer defined as doing precisely what one's father had
done. Many of our most basic ideas
about the role of the individual as citizen, the nature of politics and
political culture, and the point of a humanistic civic identity come from
formulations that took shape between 508 and 404 BCE on the Attic peninsula.
The course is two-pronged: its outline is historical, the study of how Athens
grew into the complex city it became in the fifth century. To this end, we'll study the sociological,
historical, and political transitions that were crucial in shaping Athenian
culture, from the rule of law instituted by Draco and Solon, through the
tyranny of the Pisistratids, to the period of the Cleisthenic democratic
revolution and its later radicalization by Pericles and the demagogues. On the other hand, much of the interpretive
content of the course will concern the qualities of the culture. We’ll read
some of the biographies of Plutarch, tragedies of Aeschylus, Sophocles, and
Euripides, comedies of Aristophanes, history as written by Herodotus and
Thucydides, and some philosophical essays of Plato and Aristotle. I hope that the two prongs, historical and
cultural, will come together in such a way that they enrich each other: one
understands the history by understanding the cultural values of its citizens,
and one understands the culture by looking at the historical forces that shaped
it.
CRN |
93370 |
Distribution |
B/D |
Course
No. |
CLAS 242 |
||
Title |
Classical
Mythology |
||
Professor |
Alan Zeitlin |
||
Schedule |
Mon Wed 1:30 pm - 2:50 pm PRE 128 |
This course will introduce students to the major
myths of ancient Greece and Rome. The
main goal will be for the student to gain an easy familiarity with the myths in
thematic contexts (the creation of the world and humanity, the origin of the distinction between male
and female, etc). Readings (all in
English translation) are largely of primary texts from Greek and Roman
literature, though I also plan to bring in comparanda from other cultures,
especially ancient India and the Near East.
We shall explore the use of myth in the arts (mainly literature, but
also painting and sculpture) and in cult.
Along the way, we shall examine and practice deploying various
theoretical approaches to myth, including psychoanalytic and structuralist
methodologies. No previous background
is required.
CRN |
93139 |
Distribution |
A/D |
Course
No. |
CLAS 260 |
||
Title |
Confucius
and Socrates |
||
Professor |
William Mullen |
||
Schedule |
Mon Wed 3:00 pm - 4:20 pm LC 206 |
Cross-listed: Asian Studies, Philosophy
Confucius (551–469 BC) and Socrates (470-399 BC)
stand at the head of the Chinese and the Greek philosophical traditions, above
all in the realm of ethical and political inquiry. The accounts left of their
activity, and the schools of thought which rose around them during their lives
and in the first centuries after their deaths, in both cases give evidence of
two real historical figures whose time was consumed in passionate striving to
find out what is the best life for a human being and the best form of
government for human flourishing. And there is both a Confucian and a Socratic
“problem”: we cannot be sure that any words attributed to either were actually
theirs, and see growing differences among the subsequent thinkers and schools
which pursued their work in either’s name. In search of Confucius we will read
the complete Analects and selections from Mencius and Xunzi; of Socrates,
dialogues by Plato and Xenophon and key passages in Aristotle and the Cynics.
We will read the two sets of texts concurrently and sometimes pause to ask comparative
questions. What differences can be seen in the accounts given of the virtues
each thinker put forward as most essential to fulfilling one'’ humanity? Why is
neither an advocate of democracy? Could Confucius and Socrates be friends? Open
to first year students.
CRN |
93030 |
Distribution |
C |
Course
No. |
HIST / CLAS 300 |
||
Title |
Major
Conference: Creating History |
||
Professor |
Carolyn DeWald |
||
Schedule |
Th 10:30 am - 12:50 pm OLIN 307 |
Cross-listed: History
The word “history” comes from the first sentence of
Herodotus, the Greek historian of the fifth century BCE, commonly called the
Father of History. In Herodotus' hands, however, “historie” meant not history,
the intellectual discipline as we know it today, but rather “investigation,” or
even “eye-witness examination.” In this
course we will look closely at how history as a field of inquiry came about,
and the way that the first two great Greek historians, Herodotus and
Thucydides, shaped its identity. We will read Herodotus' History of the Persian Wars and Thucydides' History of the Peloponnesian War, but we will read them not so much
for their informational content about what happened in 481-479 and 431-404 BCE
as for evidence about how the first two western historians thought about such
things as data (when is it trustworthy?), narrative structure (does this
inevitably distort the data?), depiction of character (what role does the
individual have in shaping events?), and their own ideas about the usefulness
of the discipline that they invented (does it tell a true story? does this
matter?). We will use contemporary
postmodern controversies about what history is, and the degree to which it can
be trusted or is useful, as the frame through which to examine the accomplishments
of Herodotus and Thucydides. In short
-- is “'history” just another form of narrative fiction? Or does it have a data-driven integrity that
separates it decisively from other kinds of creative narrative? This is an Upper College Seminar for
moderated students, and it is particularly recommended as a major conference
for concentrators in Historical Studies.